Authors: Anthony S. Zannas; Sarah D. Linnstaedt; Xinming An; Jennifer S. Stevens; Nathaniel G. Harnett; Alyssa R. Roeckner; Katelyn I. Oliver; David R. Rubinow; Elisabeth B. Binder; Karestan C. Koenen; Kerry J. Ressler; Samuel A. McLean · Research
Can Biological Aging Predict PTSD Risk After Trauma?
Study finds advanced epigenetic age at time of trauma predicts PTSD risk and brain changes
Source: Zannas, A. S., Linnstaedt, S. D., An, X., Stevens, J. S., Harnett, N. G., Roeckner, A. R., Oliver, K. I., Rubinow, D. R., Binder, E. B., Koenen, K. C., Ressler, K. J., & McLean, S. A. (2023). Epigenetic aging and PTSD outcomes in the immediate aftermath of trauma. Psychological Medicine, 53, 7170-7179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723000636
What you need to know
- Advanced biological aging, measured by DNA methylation patterns, at the time of trauma predicts higher risk of developing PTSD in the following 6 months
- This increased PTSD risk is specifically linked to more severe intrusive memories and nightmares
- Advanced biological aging is also associated with reduced volume in parts of the amygdala, a brain region involved in processing emotions and stress
Biological Aging and PTSD Risk
Experiencing trauma can have long-lasting effects on mental health, with some individuals developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the aftermath. However, not everyone exposed to trauma develops PTSD, and researchers have long sought to understand what factors influence this risk. A new study provides evidence that biological aging may play an important role in determining who is more likely to develop PTSD after trauma.
The research, conducted by Anthony S. Zannas and colleagues, examined a group of 289 individuals who had recently experienced trauma and presented to emergency departments. The researchers collected blood samples when participants first arrived at the hospital and used these to measure patterns of DNA methylation - chemical modifications to DNA that can reflect a person’s biological age. They then followed up with participants over the next 6 months to assess PTSD symptoms.
Measuring Biological Age
To understand the study’s findings, it’s helpful to know a bit about how biological age is measured. While we typically think of age in terms of years since birth (chronological age), our bodies and cells can age at different rates depending on genetics, lifestyle, and environmental exposures. Scientists have developed ways to estimate this biological aging process by looking at specific patterns of DNA methylation.
This study used several different measures of epigenetic aging, with the most predictive being a metric called GrimAge. GrimAge was designed to predict lifespan and healthspan, making it particularly relevant for understanding health risks. Importantly, GrimAge can differ from a person’s chronological age - some individuals may be biologically “older” or “younger” than their actual age in years.
Key Findings
The researchers found that individuals with more advanced biological age (higher GrimAge) at the time of trauma were more likely to develop PTSD over the following 6 months. Specifically:
- Those in the highest third of GrimAge scores had a 44% higher risk of PTSD compared to those in the lowest third.
- Advanced biological age predicted worse trajectories for intrusive memories and nightmares, two key symptoms of PTSD.
- The link between advanced biological age and PTSD risk remained even after accounting for factors like chronological age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, and prior trauma exposure.
These findings suggest that biological aging processes may influence how resilient or vulnerable an individual is to developing PTSD after experiencing trauma.
Brain Changes Associated with Biological Aging
To further explore the mechanisms that might explain this link between biological aging and PTSD risk, the researchers also conducted brain imaging on a subset of 63 participants two weeks after their trauma exposure.
They found that individuals with more advanced biological age tended to have smaller volumes in certain parts of the amygdala. The amygdala is a region of the brain involved in processing emotions, particularly fear and stress responses. Specifically, advanced biological age was associated with reduced volume in areas called the cortico-amygdaloid transition and the cortical and accessory basal nuclei.
These structural brain differences may help explain why biologically older individuals are at higher risk for developing PTSD. Changes in amygdala volume and function have been previously linked to PTSD in other studies. The current findings suggest that accelerated biological aging may lead to changes in key brain regions that then increase vulnerability to stress-related disorders like PTSD.
Implications for PTSD Prevention and Treatment
This research opens up new avenues for understanding, predicting, and potentially preventing PTSD. Some key implications include:
Screening potential: Measuring biological age through DNA methylation patterns could potentially help identify individuals at higher risk for PTSD after trauma exposure. This could allow for more targeted early interventions.
Intervention targets: Understanding the biological processes that increase PTSD vulnerability may point to new targets for preventive treatments. For example, interventions that slow biological aging might help reduce PTSD risk.
Personalized approaches: The findings highlight how individual differences in biological processes can influence mental health outcomes. This supports the need for more personalized approaches to PTSD prevention and treatment.
Lifestyle factors: While not directly examined in this study, the results raise questions about whether lifestyle factors that influence biological aging (like diet, exercise, and stress management) might also impact PTSD risk.
Limitations and Future Directions
It’s important to note some limitations of the study. The sample size was relatively small, particularly for the brain imaging analyses. Additionally, while the study shows a link between biological aging and PTSD risk, it cannot prove that accelerated aging directly causes PTSD. Other factors not measured in the study could potentially influence both aging and PTSD risk.
Future research will be needed to replicate these findings in larger and more diverse groups of trauma survivors. It will also be valuable to examine whether interventions that target biological aging processes can help prevent or treat PTSD.
Conclusions
- Advanced biological age, measured by DNA methylation patterns, predicts higher risk of developing PTSD after trauma exposure.
- This increased risk is specifically linked to more severe intrusive memories and nightmares.
- Advanced biological age is associated with reduced volume in parts of the amygdala, a brain region involved in fear and stress processing.
- These findings open up new possibilities for predicting PTSD risk and developing targeted interventions.
This research provides a new perspective on PTSD risk, highlighting how underlying biological processes related to aging may influence mental health outcomes after trauma. By bridging the fields of epigenetics, neuroscience, and psychiatry, it offers promising directions for improving our ability to prevent and treat PTSD.