Authors: Youngseo Son; Sean A. P. Clouston; Roman Kotov; Johannes C. Eichstaedt; Evelyn J. Bromet; Benjamin J. Luft; H. Andrew Schwartz · Research
Can AI Analyze Language to Predict PTSD Symptoms in 9/11 Responders?
AI analysis of interview language predicts PTSD symptom trajectories in 9/11 World Trade Center responders.
Source: Son, Y., Clouston, S. A. P., Kotov, R., Eichstaedt, J. C., Bromet, E. J., Luft, B. J., & Schwartz, H. A. (2023). World Trade Center responders in their own words: predicting PTSD symptom trajectories with AI-based language analyses of interviews. Psychological Medicine, 53, 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721002294
What you need to know
- AI-based analysis of language from oral history interviews predicted PTSD symptoms in 9/11 World Trade Center responders.
- Use of anxious language predicted worsening PTSD symptoms over time, while use of “we” language predicted improvement.
- Language analysis may provide a valuable tool for early detection and intervention in PTSD, complementing traditional assessments.
The Power of Words: AI Analyzes Language to Predict PTSD
The devastating events of September 11, 2001, left an indelible mark on the lives of many, particularly the brave responders who rushed to help at the World Trade Center (WTC). While their heroic efforts saved countless lives, many responders continue to grapple with the psychological aftermath, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Identifying those at risk for developing or worsening PTSD symptoms is crucial for providing timely and effective interventions. Now, a groundbreaking study has revealed that artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of language may offer a powerful new tool in predicting PTSD trajectories among these responders.
AI Meets Psychology: A Novel Approach
Researchers from Stony Brook University and Stanford University conducted a study to explore whether AI-based language assessments could predict PTSD symptom trajectories in WTC responders. The study analyzed oral history interviews from 124 responders who were part of the Stony Brook WTC Health and Wellness Program. These interviews, which lasted about an hour each, covered the responders’ memories of 9/11, their experiences during the disaster relief efforts, and how the events impacted their lives.
The innovative aspect of this study lies in its use of AI to analyze the language used in these interviews. The researchers employed several AI-based tools to assess various aspects of the responders’ language, including:
- Psychological traits (anxiety, depression, neuroticism, and extraversion)
- Linguistic style (use of first-person singular and plural pronouns, articles)
- Language meta-features (word count and average word length)
These AI-based assessments were then compared with the responders’ PTSD symptom severity, measured using the PTSD Checklist (PCL), both at the time of the interview and in follow-up assessments over several years.
Key Findings: Language as a Window to Mental Health
The study yielded several important findings that highlight the potential of language analysis in predicting PTSD symptoms:
Current PTSD Severity
Responders who used more depressive language and more first-person singular pronouns (e.g., “I”, “me”, “my”) in their interviews tended to have higher PTSD symptom severity at the time of the interview. This aligns with previous research showing that self-focused language often correlates with depression and other mental health issues.
Predicting Future PTSD Trajectories
Perhaps the most exciting finding was that certain language patterns predicted how PTSD symptoms would change over time:
Anxious language: Responders who used more anxious language in their interviews were more likely to experience worsening PTSD symptoms in the future.
First-person plural pronouns: Interestingly, greater use of words like “we”, “us”, and “our” predicted improvement in PTSD symptoms over time. This suggests that a sense of social connection and collective identity might serve as a protective factor against PTSD.
Longer words: The use of longer words in interviews was also associated with improvement in PTSD symptoms. This could potentially reflect higher cognitive functioning or education levels, which might contribute to resilience.
Beyond Traditional Assessments
What makes these findings particularly valuable is that the language analysis provided insights beyond what traditional risk factors (such as age, gender, or occupation) could predict. Even after accounting for these factors, the language-based assessments still significantly predicted PTSD symptom trajectories.
This suggests that AI-based language analysis could be a powerful complementary tool to existing PTSD assessments. It offers a way to tap into subtle linguistic cues that might not be apparent in standard questionnaires or even to trained clinicians.
Implications for PTSD Care
The implications of this research for PTSD care are substantial:
Early detection: By analyzing language patterns in routine interviews or conversations, healthcare providers might be able to identify individuals at higher risk for developing or worsening PTSD symptoms, even before these symptoms become severe.
Personalized interventions: Understanding an individual’s linguistic patterns could help tailor interventions. For example, someone using a lot of anxious language might benefit from anxiety-focused treatments, while someone using few plural pronouns might benefit from interventions that foster social connections.
Monitoring progress: Regular language analysis could provide an objective measure of how an individual’s mental state is changing over time, complementing self-reported symptoms and clinician assessments.
Scalability: Once developed, AI-based language analysis tools can be applied quickly and consistently, potentially allowing for wider screening and monitoring of at-risk populations.
Limitations and Future Directions
While these findings are promising, it’s important to note some limitations of the study. The sample was predominantly male and included many police officers, which may limit generalizability to other populations. Additionally, the mechanisms underlying the predictive power of language patterns were not directly tested.
Future research could explore whether these findings hold true for other traumatized populations, such as combat veterans or survivors of natural disasters. It would also be valuable to investigate how language patterns might change in response to different PTSD treatments, potentially providing insights into treatment effectiveness.
Conclusions
- AI-based language analysis shows promise as a tool for predicting PTSD symptom trajectories in trauma-exposed individuals.
- Certain language patterns, such as anxious language and use of first-person plural pronouns, may serve as linguistic markers of PTSD risk or resilience.
- Integrating language analysis into PTSD assessment and care could lead to earlier detection and more personalized interventions.
This groundbreaking research opens up new possibilities for understanding and treating PTSD. By harnessing the power of AI to analyze the subtle cues in our language, we may be able to offer more timely and effective support to those grappling with the psychological aftermath of trauma. As this field of study continues to evolve, it holds the potential to transform our approach to mental health care, offering hope for more personalized and effective treatments for PTSD and other psychological conditions.